Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 03:28

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How do I express sarcasm in non-dialogue text when writing a fiction novel?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The #1 High-Protein Snack for Better Blood Sugar, According to a Dietitian - EatingWell
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
In what ways Indian parents are destroying their children's life?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What happens when you have paranoid schizophrenia?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
At what stage in your life did you realize, "No, I can't do this any more" and walk out? Why?